Discussion:
troglodytes
(too old to reply)
Robin Becker
2024-08-13 09:24:25 UTC
Permalink
I am clearly one of the troglodytes referred to in recent discussions around the PSF. I've been around in python land
for far too long, my eyesight fails etc etc.

I feel strongly that a miscarriage of justice has been made in the 3-month banning of a famous python developer from
some areas of discourse.

I have had my share of disagreements with others in the past and have been sometimes violent or disrespectful in emails.

I might have been in the kill list of some, but never banned from any mailing lists.

Honest dialogue is much better than imposed silence.

-- grumblingly-yrs --
Robin Becker
Michael Torrie
2024-08-13 14:54:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Robin Becker
I am clearly one of the troglodytes referred to in recent discussions around the PSF. I've been around in python land
for far too long, my eyesight fails etc etc.
I feel strongly that a miscarriage of justice has been made in the 3-month banning of a famous python developer from
some areas of discourse.
I have had my share of disagreements with others in the past and have been sometimes violent or disrespectful in emails.
I might have been in the kill list of some, but never banned from any mailing lists.
Honest dialogue is much better than imposed silence.
-- grumblingly-yrs --
Robin Becker
Agreed. Here's a good summary of the issue:
https://chrismcdonough.substack.com/p/the-shameful-defenestration-of-tim

The PSF has really screwed this up. Really embarrassing, frankly. And
sad.
Left Right
2024-08-13 23:21:25 UTC
Permalink
Hahah, as someone with extensive experience of being banned by various
CoC-waving Python online communities' authorities I really enjoyed the
saga. Watching little men grasp for power on the Web to squash their
opponents never stops to amuse me.

On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 4:56 PM Michael Torrie via Python-list
Post by Michael Torrie
Post by Robin Becker
I am clearly one of the troglodytes referred to in recent discussions around the PSF. I've been around in python land
for far too long, my eyesight fails etc etc.
I feel strongly that a miscarriage of justice has been made in the 3-month banning of a famous python developer from
some areas of discourse.
I have had my share of disagreements with others in the past and have been sometimes violent or disrespectful in emails.
I might have been in the kill list of some, but never banned from any mailing lists.
Honest dialogue is much better than imposed silence.
-- grumblingly-yrs --
Robin Becker
https://chrismcdonough.substack.com/p/the-shameful-defenestration-of-tim
The PSF has really screwed this up. Really embarrassing, frankly. And
sad.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
geodandw
2024-08-14 20:26:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Left Right
Hahah, as someone with extensive experience of being banned by various
CoC-waving Python online communities' authorities I really enjoyed the
saga. Watching little men grasp for power on the Web to squash their
opponents never stops to amuse me.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 4:56 PM Michael Torrie via Python-list
Why do you have to belittle other people?
Left Right
2024-08-14 22:19:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by geodandw
Why do you have to belittle other people?
Who says I have to? I like to! I like to see people driven by all
sorts of low and reprehensible motives being punished for it. I don't
know if I need to explain this motivation further. I think it's a very
natural feeling. Human nature if you will. The primordial sense of
justice, that was later developed into a bunch of different theories
of how justice might work.
Ethan Furman
2024-08-14 22:40:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Left Right
Post by geodandw
Why do you have to belittle other people?
Who says I have to? I like to! I like to see people driven by all
sorts of low and reprehensible motives being punished for it. I don't
know if I need to explain this motivation further. I think it's a very
natural feeling. Human nature if you will. The primordial sense of
justice, that was later developed into a bunch of different theories
of how justice might work.
It is not necessary to belittle in order to enjoy justice.

--
~Ethan~
Mike Dewhirst
2024-08-14 23:53:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Torrie
Post by Robin Becker
I am clearly one of the troglodytes referred to in recent discussions around the PSF. I've been around in python land
for far too long, my eyesight fails etc etc.
I feel strongly that a miscarriage of justice has been made in the 3-month banning of a famous python developer from
some areas of discourse.
I have had my share of disagreements with others in the past and have been sometimes violent or disrespectful in emails.
I might have been in the kill list of some, but never banned from any mailing lists.
Honest dialogue is much better than imposed silence.
-- grumblingly-yrs --
Robin Becker
https://chrismcdonough.substack.com/p/the-shameful-defenestration-of-tim
The PSF has really screwed this up. Really embarrassing, frankly. And
sad.
I read Chris McDonough's defence of Tim Peters and he has convinced me.
Not because of everything he said but because I have experience of
committees. And other things.

The problem is generational.

Later generations can see the faults of earlier generations in brilliant
hindsight. I certainly did.

In my case, those earlier generations caused depressions and world wars.
That was pretty bad wasn't it?

Can I blame my ancestors for that? My great-grandparents were born in
the second half of the 1800s; my grandparents in the late 1800s. They
were undoubtedly responsible for WW1 and the great depression wouldn't
you say?

So my parents who grew up after WW1 and both fought in WW2 were forced
to give the best years of their lives to the worst of times. Not their
fault. In fact they were heroic to do all that and have me and my
siblings starting in their mid-twenties.

Here's the rub: they had serious faults and I could see them clearly -
when I was in my twenties and having children of my own.

I'll be 80 next year and I have a clearer perspective now.

I now understand why the oldest known culture (60k+ years) survived
intact for so long including the last few thousand years of trading
between Australia and Asia and more recent centuries with Europe. It
wasn't entirely due to isolation. In fact there were hundreds of
separate nations and languages in Australia so no-one was all that
isolated. They had traders and diplomats and warriors just like the rest
of humanity.

The difference isn't with them it is with us. We have lost what keeps
them together. They respect their elders. We don't. They had to because
their survival depended on lore and knowledge which was passed orally
across generations.

The real difference is the invention of the printing press and its
successors right down to television and the internet.

We no longer rely on our elders for knowledge.

That has eroded respect.

With each generation the erosion gets worse. When I was a child, my
parents gave me a bike and a set of encyclopedia. They tested me on my
knowledge and taught me other stuff too, which I can't remember now but
I could look it up.

Our children got bikes and encyclopedia too but they were growing up
after Germaine Greer published "The Female Eunuch". They are Gen Xers.
That means they became totally aware of female emancipation and the
comcomitant male emancipation and other isms.

Knowledge is a small part of life. You have heard "it's not what you
know, it's who you know".

Inherited wealth solves all problems for the wealthy because that
inheritance includes every "who" who matters. For the rest of us getting
on with people is what really matters. Without the right "who", survival
is at risk. All the knowledge in the world is at our fingertips today
and still our survival needs to be curated.

So PSF Board members survival depends not on knowledge nor on having
policies and codes of conduct but on the right "who".

The survival of the Board and perhaps even the P language itself depends
on elders.

Elders have something which was well respected by earlier generations.
That is lore which is steeped in experience. Leadership can be taught
and learned. Experience has to be experienced. Young people almost by
definition, don't have it. "Young" is obviously a relative term given
one's perspective.

Experience and respect for experience kept the oldest known culture on
the planet functioning for a very long time. Even the advent of the web
has not detracted from that respect.

The PSF Board should reflect on their lack of respect for experience and
try to retrieve any damage that lack of respect may have done to the
very thing they were elected to look after.

I'm old and I respect Tim's age and would not expect him to suffer the
load of becoming BDFL but by golly that would be my preference.



--
We recommend signal.org

Signed email is an absolute defence against phishing. This email has
been signed with my private key. If you import my public key you can
automatically decrypt my signature and be sure it came from me. Your
email software can handle signing.
o1bigtenor
2024-08-15 11:24:52 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 9:06 PM Mike Dewhirst via Python-list <
Post by Robin Becker
Post by Michael Torrie
Post by Robin Becker
I am clearly one of the troglodytes referred to in recent discussions
around the PSF. I've been around in python land
Post by Michael Torrie
Post by Robin Becker
for far too long, my eyesight fails etc etc.
I feel strongly that a miscarriage of justice has been made in the
3-month banning of a famous python developer from
Post by Michael Torrie
Post by Robin Becker
some areas of discourse.
I have had my share of disagreements with others in the past and have
been sometimes violent or disrespectful in emails.
Post by Michael Torrie
Post by Robin Becker
I might have been in the kill list of some, but never banned from any
mailing lists.
Post by Michael Torrie
Post by Robin Becker
Honest dialogue is much better than imposed silence.
-- grumblingly-yrs --
Robin Becker
https://chrismcdonough.substack.com/p/the-shameful-defenestration-of-tim
The PSF has really screwed this up. Really embarrassing, frankly. And
sad.
I read Chris McDonough's defence of Tim Peters and he has convinced me.
Not because of everything he said but because I have experience of
committees. And other things.
The problem is generational.
Later generations can see the faults of earlier generations in brilliant
hindsight. I certainly did.
In my case, those earlier generations caused depressions and world wars.
That was pretty bad wasn't it?
Can I blame my ancestors for that? My great-grandparents were born in
the second half of the 1800s; my grandparents in the late 1800s. They
were undoubtedly responsible for WW1 and the great depression wouldn't
you say?
So my parents who grew up after WW1 and both fought in WW2 were forced
to give the best years of their lives to the worst of times. Not their
fault. In fact they were heroic to do all that and have me and my
siblings starting in their mid-twenties.
Here's the rub: they had serious faults and I could see them clearly -
when I was in my twenties and having children of my own.
I'll be 80 next year and I have a clearer perspective now.
I now understand why the oldest known culture (60k+ years) survived
intact for so long including the last few thousand years of trading
between Australia and Asia and more recent centuries with Europe. It
wasn't entirely due to isolation. In fact there were hundreds of
separate nations and languages in Australia so no-one was all that
isolated. They had traders and diplomats and warriors just like the rest
of humanity.
The difference isn't with them it is with us. We have lost what keeps
them together. They respect their elders. We don't. They had to because
their survival depended on lore and knowledge which was passed orally
across generations.
The real difference is the invention of the printing press and its
successors right down to television and the internet.
We no longer rely on our elders for knowledge.
That has eroded respect.
With each generation the erosion gets worse. When I was a child, my
parents gave me a bike and a set of encyclopedia. They tested me on my
knowledge and taught me other stuff too, which I can't remember now but
I could look it up.
Our children got bikes and encyclopedia too but they were growing up
after Germaine Greer published "The Female Eunuch". They are Gen Xers.
That means they became totally aware of female emancipation and the
comcomitant male emancipation and other isms.
Knowledge is a small part of life. You have heard "it's not what you
know, it's who you know".
Inherited wealth solves all problems for the wealthy because that
inheritance includes every "who" who matters. For the rest of us getting
on with people is what really matters. Without the right "who", survival
is at risk. All the knowledge in the world is at our fingertips today
and still our survival needs to be curated.
So PSF Board members survival depends not on knowledge nor on having
policies and codes of conduct but on the right "who".
The survival of the Board and perhaps even the P language itself depends
on elders.
Elders have something which was well respected by earlier generations.
That is lore which is steeped in experience. Leadership can be taught
and learned. Experience has to be experienced. Young people almost by
definition, don't have it. "Young" is obviously a relative term given
one's perspective.
Experience and respect for experience kept the oldest known culture on
the planet functioning for a very long time. Even the advent of the web
has not detracted from that respect.
The PSF Board should reflect on their lack of respect for experience and
try to retrieve any damage that lack of respect may have done to the
very thing they were elected to look after.
I'm old and I respect Tim's age and would not expect him to suffer the
load of becoming BDFL but by golly that would be my preference.
Well - - - I'm not 80 but I can concur with all of the historical stuff
written here.

Would also agree with the conclusions drawn re: board action.

What short sighted overly politically correct thinking - - - the end result
of
these kind of brouhahas is hugely negative for any organization.

Regards
Mats Wichmann
2024-08-15 15:27:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike Dewhirst
I read Chris McDonough's defence of Tim Peters and he has convinced me.
Not because of everything he said but because I have experience of
committees. And other things.
The problem is generational.
Later generations can see the faults of earlier generations in brilliant
hindsight. I certainly did.
As another self-proclaimed troglodyte weighing in, I'm always suspicious
of authority shifting with limited explanations, which seems to have
been at the heart of the dispute. Questioning such is a responsibility
many of us take seriously.

However, I'd just like to point out: cultures evolve. Inclusivity is no
longer obtained, as in our younger days, by saying "suck it up and get
on with it". The steering council has this in their charter - PEP-13.
These are not people who are making difficult choices for reasons of
personal aggrandizement.

Loading...